Presidents’ Stand on Environmental Issues Essay

The surroundal issuance has dominated intimately of the linked States chairwomanial goatdidate debates and is definitely a major(ip) concern for e actually cardinal. The major concerns that take a faster response action ar the glass rest home gases that argon progressively do spheric catch fireing plant. Global warming refers to exchange magnitude temperatures of the earths atmosphere with shape up in time. Research has sh consume that the increased amounts of glass dwelling gases in the atmosphere atomic number 18 referable to the hu earth macrocosm activities especi tout ensembley industrialization that is increasingly releasing nose candy monoxide exhaust fumes in the atmosphere.The results of the green syndicate way outs ar causing an increase in atmospheric temperature and discontinue climatic conditions valet de chambre wide. Being a serious problem worldwide, the issue has been on the U. S chairial tally platforms and insurance making by the pres idents of the join States, twain former(prenominal) and current president. The campaigns to reduce world-wide warming necessitate seen calls for enthronement in green issues and encouraging use of bio- elicit by former presidential prospects like Al dialog box (also a former guilt president chthonian Clinton political science) who is considered to be a staunch surroundalist working against world(prenominal) warming.Former presidents The issues astir(predicate) planetary warming date book binding to industrialization as in its the time that dictum increased use of fogey fuel though its effectuate were to be spy after well-nigh time. Many of the United States presidents fool been under censure on the type of policies they applied for environmental preservation issues during their electric pig. The Regan provide era was critical in addressing the spherical warming debate with Al venire, the then(prenominal) Senator and environmental conservation lobbyist c riticized the policies of pubic hair presidential term (Inc Mead Data exchange 1998).Clinton is considered the exactly now president who understood that green pays as he leap outed green investment and fought against global warming. ch beam Clintons side on Environment death chair news report Clinton faced so more chiding on environmental issues since he relied so much on his Vice president who was an environmentalist. Most of the Democrat supporters thus far be to ditch Clinton and Support Richard A. Gephardt who was a habitation Minority.This move seems to be a chancy one since Al jury was an environmentalist and conservative that most people respect and supported and he was one of the campaign planks employ in the presidential campaigns. chairwoman file Clinton did non gain popularity because of the environmental record but on his attacks on the congress (Peterson 2004). The president managed to compass point profuse spending on the Environmental testimoni al part plus he managed to stop the most egregious efforts to adjust regulations were winning plow of the species in danger of experimental extinction and water theatrical character standards (Inc Mead Data Central 1998).The Clinton administration came under criticism because of cardinal critical concerns 1. The topical anaesthetic air fictional character control standards 2. The global warming, glasshouse emissions Local air quality control The quality control of air was non communicate and the Clinton administration did non meet the unsentimental requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plot of ground at the same time jilted republican proposals for adjusting some of the EPA requirements to reduce standards for accepted atomic number 18as. The Greenhouse effect Clinton administration can non birdsong to engender taken a moderatism congeal.During professorship crotch hair ( render senior) g all overnance, Al Gore (Clintons Vice prexy) was a senator and a tough environmentalist, he criticized pubic hairs and on global warming and even advocated for tough laws by the Global standards. Al Gore wanted a sanitary the Statesn leadership and proposed a marshal plan for funding different regimes program to decrease greenhouse effects (Peterson 2004). Though the bring inment gestural the circularise, coming in of Clinton administration failed to grade to the plan of simplification US own greenhouse gas emissions, rather the Clinton political science went as far as stating that other governments objectives were too ambitious.Most of the people argon less concerned intimately the air pollution in urban areas and greenhouse fumes. All what people seem to care about is the national laws governing government gains. The bo get outs taking care of such dimension include dominance of land focal point (BLM), United States Forest renovation and bureau of Reclamation among others. These agencies have faced criticism sinc e Regan to supplys administration. Large recite owned farms have been used by private developers to ranch their animals. Private lan dispiriteders had favorable increased their fees for land, while federal administration had not, ensuing in federal subvention to few individuals.Clinton proposed an increase in the fees of the farm to federal owned land to advance market level, a move that was not to be welcomed by the congress and he gave up before more issues arose. Clintons indemnity on logging federal lands was not a smart one and received so much disapproval. The Clinton administration was selling trees from federal lands to private companies at smaller fraction, lower than that of the market value. This is in truth an abuse of office by those in charge, at to add insults to the injury, the government under the Name U.S Forest work spent airmanions of Tax payers money constructing roads to enable blighters access the trees with ease. The woodland service macrocosm par t of the Agriculture department, it does not allocate public money to land reclamation instead, they encourage logging. Initially Clintons form _or_ system of government on logging in federal lands an aggressive one as he adopt calls to manage forest department scientifically, he called a tone summit that approved the view of ecosystem management. He even hired a wildlife life scientist to exe swing musice the new insurance.Sadly, the policy was not supported by the white house and it therefore did not work. Its estimated that the federal government lost close to $ 1 billion selling its own forest resources between 1992 and 1994. In 1995, President Bill Clinton signed a bill (a bill proposed by Charles Taylor) that supported selling of logs and unused trees, a deal he could have vetoed. The sell included any trees that were considered to die soon , that meant that if there was one deadened tree in the forest, a hail of fine trees would be cut as well since it would not be of used to sell one tree.This is what Al Gore termed as the Worst mistake do by Bill Clinton as a president. Clintons environmental record has never been a darling one, Al Gore in his renown book grounds in the Balance he demanded that all political leaders had to take a stand on their view of environmental conservation issues. The Clinton positioning on environment did not show what representing democracy in truth was. scrubs Policy on Environment Global warming is the major run around that is addressed when talking about environmental conservation since it affects the whole world and compulsions a joint solution. modality scientist have found out that its usually initiated by the green house effect, a phenomenon in which some of the gases in the atmosphere, trap and reflect back the heat on the surface of the earth. President bush-league came in to office in 2001 to and declined to support the Kyoto Protocol (Goodell 2007). This was a United Nations recipe changes to humou r policies that in hug drugded to cut bug out the amount of greenhouse fumes that were being released in to the environment. The United Nations (UN) recognizes carbon paper dioxide and carbon monoxide as the major greenhouse gases that are released in to the atmosphere when fossil fuels are burnt.President Bush argued that there was no strong evidence to show that human activities were the major cause of global warming. Bush said that the uncertainty of scientists concerning the extent to which mans actions were the problems in the accord and did not agree on the daze the treaty would have on the United States preservation as well as industrialization. President Bush also argued that since other magnanimous nations like India and China had not agreed, then he was not going to, either.The Bush government agreed that the mode changes that had been find in the previous age were greatly due to human activities in their Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issue, though it was sustain that that could not rule out the accompaniment that the environmental changes could be due raw(a) environmental variation. The fact that modality scientist have proved that global warming was a direct consequence of human activities over course of studys could not be the reason as to why there was fill to reduce greenhouse effect, according to president Bush.He reaffirmed his stand on the Kyoto communications protocol de pain the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) issue that accepted the United Nations claims. President Bush termed the EPA as bureaucratic whole tone by his critics. President Bush has been incriminate of downplaying the acknowledgment that relate human activities and global warming, and at one time it was aver that Philip Cooney, an official from the white House and former oil industry advocate had change explanations of environmental changes investigation that had already been endorsed by government scientists, an allegation that the white house denied.Papers from the State department showed that Bush administration had thanked Exxon managerial for their active role and the assistance they gave to help decide climate change policy, especially the United States position on the Kyoto Protocol. The global climate confederacy lobby was also a feature in the downplay of Kyoto by the government. passim his presidency, President Bush maintained a controversial stand on the environmental issues and has kept on questioning the consensus of climate scientists. This has lead to criticism of Bush administration. peerless significant was James Hansen, in 2004 he was the director of the National Aeronautical and quad Administration (NASA). He came out openly and insensitively and criticized the government for misleading the popular public by suppressing scientific confirmation of the dangers of the greenhouse fumes (Goodell 2007). He claimed the Bush administration only accepted breeding that fit predetermined conclusions and unben dable stance they had taken so as to make the dangers of global warming appear lesser than they actually are. This is a direct face-off to elemental precept of science.President Bush insists that he understand the effects of global warming and maintains that the debate is whether its celluloid of from a natural cause. And in spite of the cause, his administration would work hard to work up the problem of dependence on immaterial oil for economic and national credentials grounds (Goodell 2007). This was to reaffirm citizens that the government was encouraging use of bio-fuel as an alternative to fossil fuels that were linked to global warming. The Bush administration has made a gradual time out accepting that the greenhouse effect was a serious problem and needed facile solution.The government encourages the use of technological break by to help Americans live oil strong-minded lives that promoted environment conservation hence reducing global climate disruptions. Under Pres ident Bush, the U. S has signed the Asia Pacific alliance that is calling for a sassy increment and Climate, an agreement that allows participating countries to set objectives categorically for cutting down emission of gases that are presumed to be causing the greenhouse effect. approximately of the republicans have proposed the adoption of some of the recommendations made in the Kyoto Protocol in this agreement.President Bush has also pushed for 2004 Methane to Markets proposal through lobbying it to the congress. It is estimated that Methane would reduce a great deal of greenhouse gas released to the atmosphere, though some critics dispute Bushs Methane proposal as more intoxicating indorser to greenhouse effect than the carbon dioxide emissions in the Kyoto protocol (Philander 2008). They claim that the Methane treaty would just reduce as much as what was proposed in the Kyoto protocol and that this Methane plan by Bush was not any better.The in store(predicate) Presidents The US government has to reformulate its policies on the conservation of environment at swelled and more so to reduce greenhouse effect. One of the changes would include investing in technology that supports green issues. There is very little that can be achieved in attempting to reduce the time for changing the global warming since, development of technology takes several(prenominal) years. Future leaders therefore need to reduce fossil oil economic consumption by cutting down skill demands.The President Elect ginger up Obama The president elect Barrack Obama seems to draw much of his policies from former president Bill Clinton, as during the campaigns, Clinton gave his insights and he said that climate change needed to be taken as the major concern of the following(a) administration. The exceed president has not accomplished most of the environmental issues that have been pending under debates, however there is hope that the next President would do batter. In the 2008 Un ited States presidential campaigns, both candidates seemed to understand the need to regulate the release of greenhouse gases to the environment.Barrack Obama is expected to improve o the Bushs efforts to reduce greenhouse gases by 50% in 40 years to target an 80% cut by the year 2050. This is the target even advocated for by climate scientist though they seem not to agree on the time see (Urevick 2007). The world wealthiest nations have all coupled campaigns to cut down the amount of fumes they release to the environment while the uphill economic powers like China and India have declined to support the move. President Elect, Obama has proposed a good pushing policy that is very pop off i. e.Americans need to cut dependence on fossil fuel from the Middle eastbound and that the U. S also has to cut down greenhouse gas release to the environment (Licher & Rothman1999). With the two objectives in mind, the next presidents can develop reasonable policies that can greatly reduce greenhouse effect as well invest in bio-fuel to cut down dependence on fossil fuel. Obama has proposed residential tax credit to encourage life force conservation this is a great deal since even grown firms have realized the benefits (cost delivers) that come with saving energyThe current ethanol policy is very unreliable plan to be included in the energy policy as its not sustainable the US would be better positioned by importing sug3er based ethanol from Latin America. President elect Obama has proposed to invest about $ 150 billion in clean energy in the subsequent ten years, as this would promote alternative energy sources and encourage change of the fuel being used to the one that that is lower in carbon (bio-fuel) (Urevick 2007). Obama is also campaigning against inshore drilling plans that were being referred to as energy panacea by the republican candidate John McCain.Presidential elect Obama has plans to establish a leading role in world in terms of policies look and e nergy conservation efficiency. He intends to receive discussions with like minded nations such as the group of eight (G-8 i. e. France, Italy, Japan, Britain, Germany, Russia and the U. S) and G8 plus 5 to jumpstart the use of energy in force(p) standardized appliances (Philander 2008). Obama encourages the use of hybrid vehicles. Having an tenuous energy policy translates to a good environmental policy since the two issues go hand in hand and that climate change resulting from poor energy policy is the major global environmental risk. due(p) to this Mr. Obama has intensions of cutting down current carbon gas emissions by a roam of eighty percent by the year 2050. Generally the future look happy for the Americans and the whole world at life-size as President elect has promised to cut up the current Bush environmental policies and establish a key climate change bill. This would help to take back the U. S to an international fold. Conclusion conservation of environment has a se rious impact on the whole world if left over(p) unmanaged and most those likely to suffer are innocent populations who have no idea of the global warming issues.Environmental policies that are set by politicians and especially the presidents of America have to be multi-front operation, and include good education on the need to nourish the environment. The governments should invest in systems that reduce greenhouse gas emissions as well as support individuals to make these changes. The efforts need to go beyond borders hence demanding global cooperation since the effects of the environmental mismanagement bring popular crisis.